In yesterday’s Silkin Management Group blog, one of my fellow Silkin Management Group consultants wrote about the debate going on regarding raising the debt ceiling for the federal government. (You can access that article at this Silkin Management Group blog site: http://blog.silkinmanagementgroup.com/)
After reading the above mentioned blog, something caught my eye while reading a report concerning what is going on in Washington regarding this whole issue. I thought I’d pass it along to readers of our various Silkin Management Group blog sites. It concerns a statement made by Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, made while questioning Ben Bernake, the chairman of the Federal Reserve. Whether you think well of Congressman Paul or not, his statement is food for thought:
“Perhaps the most abhorrent bit of chicanery has been the threat that if a deal is not reached to increase the debt by August 2nd, social security checks may not go out. In reality, the Chief Actuary of Social Security confirmed last week that current Social Security tax receipts are more than enough to cover current outlays. The only reason those checks would not go out would be if the administration decided to spend those designated funds elsewhere. It is very telling that the administration would rather frighten seniors dependent on social security checks than alarm their big banking friends, who have already received $5.3 trillion in bailouts, stimulus and quantitative easing. This instance of trying to blackmail Congress into tax increases by threatening social security demonstrates how scary it is to be completely dependent on government promises and why many young people today would jump at the chance to opt out of Social Security al together.
I have always found it interesting, from a financial planning point of view, that the government takes our social security money and puts it in the general funds and spends it on anything it chooses to, like wars, rather than setting it aside for what it was designated for – paying Social Security benefits. Yes, the amount of money coming in for many years exceeded the outgo due to the age discrepancies of payers and payees, but had the excess money not been spent elsewhere, there would be no looming lack of Social Security funds to deal with. And Mr. Paul makes it a point that Social Security income can still pay for the present benefits payments, as long as the money isn’t taken for other uses.
Whatever your take on all of this is, whether you like Congressman Paul or not, I thought that readers of our blog sites, whether Silkin Management Group clients or not, would be interested in this debate from a financial planning point of view.
Dave McKevitt
Silkin Management Group Consultant
If you would like more information about Silkin Management Group and/or Silkin Management Group’s services, visit our website at www.silkinmanagementgroup.com